Prepare a first proposal from approved firm knowledge.
Gather relevant experience, service descriptions, team information, and commercial inputs. Draft the response, show the sources used, and send it to the account owner for review.
AI for professional services
OriginLines builds AI workflows for professional services firms in the UK and internationally. The systems prepare proposals, move client onboarding forward, process documents, and help teams find approved knowledge without removing professional judgment.

Where to start
The first automation should remove a complete operating task, not add another assistant that still leaves people copying results between systems. We start with the workflow, the source records, the review step, and the measure that shows whether the work improved.
Gather relevant experience, service descriptions, team information, and commercial inputs. Draft the response, show the sources used, and send it to the account owner for review.
Check required information, prepare the workspace, update the CRM and delivery tools, draft client communication, and route missing or conflicting details to the right person.
Search policies, methods, prior deliverables, and account knowledge while respecting document permissions and showing the evidence behind each answer.
Turn incoming files into structured records, flag missing fields, compare the content with agreed rules, and send uncertain cases to a named reviewer.
A controlled first release
This example shows the shape of a controlled workflow. It is not presented as a client result. The release boundary and measures would follow the firm's actual process.
The workflow extracts client, scope, commercial, and compliance fields, compares them with CRM records, and creates an exception list instead of guessing.
The system prepares the project record, workspace, standard tasks, and communication draft using the firm's current templates and access rules.
The owner sees extracted data, conflicts, proposed actions, and the source material before approving changes to live systems.
Business case
We do not publish a generic savings percentage. The business case starts with the firm's own volume, handling time, delay, and rework.
Time from signed agreement to a delivery-ready account.
Number of handoffs, copied fields, and separate system updates.
Cases that need rework because information was missing or entered incorrectly.
Professional and operations time no longer spent on the automated path.
Common questions
Good first candidates happen often, use accessible information, have a named owner, and end in a result the firm can measure. Proposal preparation, client onboarding, document intake, knowledge search, and standard reporting often meet those conditions.
The design must follow the firm's identity, access, retention, and provider policies. We limit the workflow to the data it needs, respect document permissions, log actions, and keep high-impact decisions with an authorised person.
No. The useful boundary is usually preparation, comparison, routing, and decision support. A qualified person keeps control of advice, commercial commitments, regulated decisions, and uncertain cases.
Start with one process that creates visible delay or cost. Establish its current volume, handling time, correction rate, and owner. The first release should complete that path with a clear review point and measurable result.
Book a consultation
Bring one manual process. We will assess its volume, cost, systems, risks, and the smallest release that could prove value.
Book a call